You know you shouldn't be using social media websites if...you're wondering how they recorded Titanic and / or telling people to relieve stress by inhaling and then "outhaling". Continue reading to see eighteen more people who shouldn't be using social media.
ReutersPeople are streaming online video more than ever before but only 17% of pay TV subscribers have watched cable programming online using so-called “TV Everywhere” services, according to a new study.
The study, from research firm GfK Media, is the latest bad news for big media companies’ TV Everywhere initiative, which is aimed at reinforcing the value of traditional cable subscriptions. But since its launch four years ago, the effort has been plagued by delays in launch as a result of difficult rights negotiations between various entertainment companies and pay TV operators – cable, satellite and phone companies.
TV Everywhere requires pay TV subscribers to sign in with their pay TV providers’ credentials to access TV programming online. The services let people watch on-demand programs, and in some cases live TV channels, on personal computers as well as mobile devices like iPads and smartphones inside the home. In a few cases the content is available outside the home.
One major obstacle, the 1000-person study showed, is the requirement for people to sign in with their cable account details to prove that they are paying video subscribers. Seventy percent of pay TV subscribers who have ever watched programming online said they would be deterred from watching Internet TV content if it required them to sign in with their cable account credentials.
TV Everywhere began as a joint push from Time Warner Inc. and Comcast Corp. as the industry’s response to the threat of cord cutting posed by the rising tide of cheap online video alternatives. The availability of content varies with channel and pay TV provider. As a result of a deal struck between Comcast Corp. and Walt Disney Co. last year, for instance, Comcast customers can watch ESPN live outside the home on tablets or mobile phones over the Internet. But other deals have been far more limited in scope.
One of the main issues that has been separating entertainment companies and pay TV providers is the question of which will deal directly with consumers, traditionally the province of providers. While providers like Comcast have made a big push to make content available online through their own website or apps – in Comcast’s case, Xfinity — channels like ESPN, Time Warner’s HBO and CNN have their own individual apps and websites with TV programming content. Those give consumers a direct relationship with channels they haven’t traditionally had.
So far, in the battle for online eyeballs, the programmers appear to have the edge. The GfK study shows that 37% of folks who have ever viewed TV online watched the content through a TV network’s app or website, while only 30% of those surveyed reported watching through a cable operator or other distributor’s online portals. That could partly be because TV watchers associate what they’re watching more with a TV channel than with their cable provider. But cable executives believe eventually customers will choose their portals so they can find everything in one place—without sifting through a number of apps.
One bright spot for distributors is that about a quarter of respondents said that they are more likely to keep their existing providers’ services as a result of their TV everywhere products. For the vast majority of those surveyed, however, it still hasn’t made a difference in how they view their cable, satellite or phone company.
In this episode of "What could possibly go wrong?!", allow us to introduce you to DCM Dealer. Billed as an "online trading platform," this here project was whipped up by the same London-based investment outfit (DCM Capital) that went belly-up after losing some $40 million in assets in just one month during the summer of 2011. Granted, that was a pretty tough time in the market, and it did manage to squeeze out a 1.9 percent gain in the period it was open, but it's still worth keeping in mind. Now, the firm is hoping to catch a second wind with a tool that mines Twitter, Facebook, and the whole of social media in order to pick up clues about the public's view on a stock. Reportedly, it'll spit out real-time ratings from 0 (negative) to 100 (positive), giving investors yet another "leading indicator" on what to invest in flip for a quick buck.
Founder Paul Hawtin confesses: "This is not some kind of holy grail of buy-sell signals that's guaranteed to make you money. This is an additional layer of market information...markets are driven by greed and fear, so if you can understand fear and quantify it in real-time, you could use that to protect yourself." We'll leave it to the 99 percent to comment on the idea below.
when.eng("eng.perm.init")